Although the trial court could consider Monica’s housing expenses in determining the amount of maintenance because the parties agreed that she would reside in the marital home for the benefit of the parties’ children, the trial court erred in subtracting $78,000 in housing expenses from her income, as she would have significant housing expenses even absent the agreement. Therefore, the trial court’s original decision to award Constantin maintenance should stand. ORDER ¶ 1 Held : The trial court erred in granting Monica’s motion to reconsider because it was an error of law or an abuse of discretion to consider the parties’ incomes for only one year under the circumstances of this case. Justices Jorgensen and Schostok concurred in the judgment. JUSTICE SPENCE delivered the judgment of the court. 15-D-1214 ) CONSTANTIN CHIRILA, ) Honorable ) Robert E. IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT In re MARRIAGE OF ) Appeal from the Circuit Court MONICA CHIRILA, ) of Du Page County. 2-17-0389 Order filed SeptemNOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e)(1).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |